Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Age and Ageing ; 51, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1901100

ABSTRACT

Introduction Innovative models of service delivery are required to provide Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for older patients presenting to the Emergency Department with frailty syndromes. Method In 2018, the Older Person’s Assessment Service began a liaison service to the ED, taking referrals from the medical and ED teams for patients who presented with frailty syndromes (falls, cognitive impairment, care dependence, polypharmacy). The service saw 437 patients April–August 2018. 76% of the patients assessed were discharged by utilising available community services, rapid access outpatient follow up and inpatient reablement off the acute site. The service was estimated to avoid 50–80 admissions per month to medicine (saving 17–23 beds a year) and was commissioned as a permanent service. Phase 2 In 2020, a dedicated unit within ED was allocated to OPAS, enabling the acceptance of patients directly from triage and from the Ambulance Service by direct referral. This provided rapid access to specialist assessment, continued access to Elderly Care services, avoided exposure to coronavirus related admissions and the risks of nosocomial infection associated with admission. The service operates from 8 am-4 pm on weekdays. Results Between June 2020 and October 2021, the service saw 1,173 new patients. 988 patients (84.5%) were discharged off the acute site on the day of assessment. 68 (5.79%) patients were admitted to other facilities run by the Health Board (e.g Inpatient Reablement). The average age of an OPAS patient was 83 yrs and had a CFS > 5. Readmission rate at 14 days was 4% (47).Of the 253 patients who were admitted to an inpatient setting, 13.5% (35) contracted nosocomial covid-19. Conclusion The service has been supported and funded to expand into extended weekday hours as a result of this success and there are plans for future 7 day working.

2.
Age and Ageing ; 51, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1901099

ABSTRACT

Background Identifying frailty can lead to improvements in patient outcomes through interventions such as CGA and prompt discussions around resuscitation and ACP. [Welsh;International Journal of Clinical Practice;2014;290– 293] Frailty is associated with a higher risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity, and mortality due to COVID-19.[Parmar;Annals of Surgery;2021;709–718, Dumitrascu;Journal of the American Geriatrics Society;2021;2, 419– 2, 429] Our audit considers whether the pandemic had any effect on documentation of frailty, and identifies interventions to improve this process. Method We retrospectively reviewed notes to look for elements of social history which identify frailty including mobility, ADLs, and CFS. We conducted a series of spot audits in February 2020 (pre-pandemic), April 2021 (Wave 2), and November 2021 (Wave 3) across surgical and medical wards. Interventions and Results February 2020 This cohort consisted of 62 patients and showed poor documentation across both medicine and surgery with an average of only 21% relevant social history recorded and 0% CFS scoring. Interventions that followed included an educational series by geriatricians and introduction of triaging tools based on CFS in response to the pandemic e.g. Swansea Hip interrogation Fracture Tool (SHiFT). [Cronin;British Orthopaedic Association;2020] April 2021 The relevant documentation improved to an average of 31% in this cohort of 37 patients. Interventions that followed included further educational sessions on frailty, a surgical liaison service, and the appointment of an orthogeriatrician. November 2021 This cohort consisted of 149 patients, average relevant social history continued to improve to 49%. Subgroup analysis showed 76% of orthopaedics patients had a CFS score, including 100% of NOF patients. Conclusion Frailty is important as it is linked to an increased risk of mortality and morbidity. In the pre-pandemic cohort, the results were poor. Improvements were seen after interventions such as educational sessions, pandemic triaging tools, and the surgical liaison service. However, there are still inconsistencies between teams. Future interventions include a CFS app, expansion of the surgical liaison service, and improved proformas.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL